Racking of urinary tract infection in obstetric emergency

Authors

  • Edlon Luiz Lamounier Júnior Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) Autor
  • Patrícia Gonçalves Evangelista Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) Autor
  • Tárik Kassem Saidah Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) Autor
  • Waldemar Naves do Amaral Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) Autor

Keywords:

URINARY TRACT INFECTION, PREGNANT WOMEN, MICROORGANISM

Abstract

Introduction: urinary tract infection (UTI) is the second most common complication in the gestational period, with a prevalence of 20%, behind only anemia. Objective: To analyze the prevalence of urinary tract infections in pregnant women attended at a public maternity hospital in Goiânia, set the frequency of contaminating urine samples and to define the most frequent agent and antibiotic of greater sensitivity and resistance in obstetric urgency.Methods: Retrospective analytical cross-sectional study conducted on pregnant women referred to Dona Iris hospital and maternity hospital from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. Results: The prevalence of urinary tract infections in this study is 6.3% with 55 of positive tests for UTI. The number of contaminated samples was 275, corresponding to 31.7% of all samples analyzed and the most common microorganism was Escheirichia coli in 73.1% of the cases and the most sensitive antibiotic was Gentamicin. The most resistant antibiotic was Trimethoprim + Sulfamethoxazole.It is also noticed that the ages were not statistically significant for each microorganism. Conclusion: The prevalence of urinary tract infections in this study was 6.3%. The most prevalent etiological agent was Escheirichia coli, the most sensitive antibiotic was Gentamicin and the most resistant antibiotic was the Trimethoprim + Sulfamethoxazole.

Published

2020-10-01

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

1.
Lamounier Júnior EL, Evangelista PG, Saidah TK, Amaral WN do. Racking of urinary tract infection in obstetric emergency. Rev Goiana Med [Internet]. 2020 Oct. 1 [cited 2026 Jan. 31];(58):20-5. Available from: https://www.amg.org.br/osj/index.php/RGM/article/view/96